Many of us believe that for ethical and practical reasons societies would be better off without a centralized ruling government.
The major unresolved challenge has been how could we get from here to there without chaos?
Not having an answer to that question, I’ve been writing about Concurrent Voluntaryism, building up voluntaryist social structures in parallel with the existing State complex.
But what if, with a few simple words, you could simultaneously…
- eliminate the one feature of Government that is the source of its coercive power
- maintain and enhance the Government’s incentive to provide services to those who still desire them
- allow immediate freedom from centralized Government for everyone who desires that option
That would get us a long way from here to there without creating chaos.
Therefore, I hereby propose the following Constitutional Amendment, which would accomplish all of those goals:
“Whereas all Men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, and that to secure these rights Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…
Section 1. Involuntary Citizenship shall no longer exist within the United States or in any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. The Benefits and Protections of Citizenship shall apply only to those who voluntarily agree to and accept the Responsibilities of Citizenship.
Section 3. The Jurisdiction of the United States, and of the individual States, shall hereafter extend only to the property of voluntary Citizens and to any property acquired by Government through voluntary exchange.
Section 4. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”
Appropriately, the wording of Section 1 of the proposed Amendment echoes the wording of the 13th Amendment, which ended Involuntary Servitude in the United States.
Below is a brief discussion of how this Involuntary Citizenship Amendment fulfills the goals listed above.
“eliminate the one feature of Government that is the source of its coercive power”
Many of the services provided by Government are important and would need to be provided, one way or another, in any modern society. The two major problems with having them provided by the State are that they are monopolies and that they are funded by theft, both features maintained by violence and threats. Eliminating its territorial monopoly eliminates the Government’s ability to enforce all of its other monopolies, except among those voluntary citizens who willingly pay for them. This is essentially the definition of ‘panarchy‘.
“maintain and enhance the Government’s incentive to provide services to those who still desire them”
Without a territorial monopoly on theft the Government will have to provide services that people willingly pay for. And they will face competition from independent service providers and from competing governments. If the current Government’s services didn’t continue, and even improve, they would risk losing all subscribers and going out of business entirely.
“allow immediate freedom from centralized Government for everyone who desires that option”
With citizenship becoming voluntary, anyone could walk away at any time. Renouncing citizenship might entail having to forfeit some future entitlement benefit or having to pay some sort of early termination fee. One might fear that such terms could be drastic and punitive, but again, because they would be competing for current and future members (citizens), there is a built-in incentive to discourage the Government from setting up terms that are overly punitive.
No way to get from here to there without total chaos?
I am not suggesting that we could successfully pass this Constitutional amendment. But I do think it eliminates the argument that a voluntary society is impossible simply because there is no way to transition from here to there without creating immediate chaos.
What do you think?